Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Homosexual Issues
Life and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
back
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Henry Halligan wrote:

Hi, guys —

I hear it argued that Jesus did not institute the priesthood and that according to Jewish law women would of been present at the Last Supper.

  • What is the best way to answer this question?

Thank You,

Henry

  { Did Jesus institute the priesthood, and by Jewish law would women have been at the Last Supper? }

Mike replied:

Hi, Henry —

You answer it three ways:

  1. Historically, Jesus instituted the priesthood on Holy Thursday. To deny a historical fact is like saying there was no New Years celebration last year, or that the arguer did not have a birthday.

  2. You can demonstrate, through the Scriptures that it was Jesus' actions, including the washing of the Apostle's feet and the Last Supper, that He instituted the priesthood on Holy Thursday. The last meal that Jesus shared with his disciples is described in all four canonical Gospels, namely in:
    • Matthew 26:17-30
    • Mark 14:12-26
    • Luke 22:7-39 and
    • John 13:1-17:26.

    This meal later became known as the Last Supper during which He says:

    "DO THIS in memory of me."

    He's telling his very first priests to celebrate this Eucharist in His memory.

  3. You answer it in a way, that your arguer will probably reject: We known Jesus instituted the priesthood in the manner we have it today because of the [Oral|Verbal] Tradition that was passed down to us in the Church until today.

    As Catholics, we believe the Word of God consists of both the Written and Oral Traditions that have been passed down to us.

You can also demonstrate that the priesthood was passed on to other priests to celebrate by quoting St. Paul:

For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me."

1 Corinthians 11:23-24

You said:
and that according to Jewish law women would of been present at the Last Supper.

I've never heard of this one and would be surprised if it is true. The Jewish culture in Jesus' time was very patriarchal. The man was always looked upon as the natural, legal and religious head of the household.

Hope this helps,

Mike

John replied:

Hi, Henry —

We've answered this before. It's in the data base.

Briefly the New Testament Priesthood has nothing to do with Levitical priesthood instituted under the Jewish law. Our Priesthood is according to order of Melchizedek; check out the book of Hebrews. Melchizedek came along in Genesis 14, long before the Levites. As the author of Hebrews says:

Abraham tithed to Melchizedek, while Levi was still in his loins. (Hebrews 7:10)

Actually, Levi was a son of Jacob, who was a son of Isaac, the son of Abraham. Our ministerial priesthood participates in a unique way, and is indeed the priesthood of Jesus Christ in Personae Cristi Capo.

Our baptismal priesthood (or as the Protestants call it, the Priesthood of believers) is likewise a participation in the same priesthood of Christ, but not in the same way.

The word Priest is a latinized version of Prest which is a Greek abbreviation for Presbyter.

Now to the point about the Last Supper. This is an argument from silence, that has no other tradition to back it up, whether it be upper or lower case "T" on the tradition. There is no case in Church history where we see Holy Orders being conveyed to women.

Christ was a man and His Body the Church is the Bride of Christ. The priest stands at the altar in the stead of Christ, the man, and makes Him present first through the Sacrament of Holy Orders so that when the Priest speaks the words of institution, it is Christ, the man, speaking through the priest, the man. And of course, then Christ becomes present under the appearance of bread and wine in the Eucharist. So the priest takes on the role as groom. A woman can't be a groom — Period — end of story — exclamation point!

Again regarding the presence of woman at the Last Supper, there is no such Jewish law. Families would gather together to celebrate the Passover so, Yes, woman would be present at the Passover meal, but even if they were, it doesn't mean Christ ordained them for the New Covenant.

The texts in which we see ordination is in John's Gospel. And I hate to break it to you but according to John's Gospel it was not the Passover meal. According to John, the Passover was going to start so the bodies were removed from the crosses early and the bones of the two thieves were broken and we know the rest of the text. So John doesn't harmonize historically or chronologically with the synoptic Gospels.

And we read further in John's Gospels after the Resurrection, the Lord breaths on the twelve and says, "Receive the Holy Spirit, whoever sins you forgive will be forgiven...." (John 20:22-23) This is different from Luke's Pentecost account. So we see special authority given to these men, that is not given to all believers when the Spirit is poured out on all flesh in Acts Chapter 2.

May God richly bless you all.

John DiMascio

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.