Bringing you the
"Good News" of Jesus Christ
and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC
Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's
magisterium
I have admired the Catholic Church for my
entire lifetime, but I am profoundly dismayed
at what
I read on this site about The Church of Jesus
Christ of (LDS) Latter-day Saints. You refer
to those of us who belong to the LDS (Latter-day
Saints) church as "masquerading
as Christians." How belittling and
how wrong!
Are you aware of the strong and close
ties between our churches in Salt Lake
City?
The cooperation we've enjoyed for many,
many years?
And this is what you think of us?
Thanks for the insider insight. I'll reevaluate
my position on the charity of your Church.
Bob
{
I
am dismayed at what I've read on your site
on the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints. }
Paul
replied:
Dear Bob,
Sometimes terminology might sound
harsh to the hearer (or reader) when
it is said by the speaker to be simply
matter-of-fact. I'm not sure where,
when, or by whom the term "masquerading" was
used, but I'm sorry it offended you.
I am happy our two churches relate
well in Utah and beyond. I have met
many Mormons who have been wonderful
people who, in my view, by the way
they live their lives seem more Catholic
than many Catholics.
The fact is, though, that Catholics,
as well as most Protestants, hold
that Mormonism is not Christian.
That is because Mormons do not believe
the central doctrine about Christ — that
He is the divine Son of God; that
He is the eternal Second Person of
the Blessed Trinity who took on a
human nature to become a human being.
So let us continue to learn from
each other, as well as forgive each
other, whenever necessary.
Peace,
Paul
Bob
replied:
Paul,
I appreciate the quick response and
your balanced remarks.
Interestingly, you don't retreat
from the adjective itself, and evidently,
you do agree with that characterization,
as you describe our doctrinal differences.
While it is true that we do not believe
in the Trinity, as Catholics and
Protestants explain it, we do believe
the "central doctrine" that
he is the divine Son of God. Our
first article of faith states:
"We believe in God the Eternal
Father, and in His son, Jesus
Christ, and in the Holy Ghost."
It is true, however, that we don't
see them as the same substance but
in different manifestations. We do
see them as separate beings, united
in purpose. Much has been written
about this difference, and we could
go on about who owns the definition
of "Christian", but that's
not for now.
As a Mormon, you won't see me writing
that Catholics masquerade as Christians
because you don't agree with me.
Catholics are Christian, obviously;
as are Protestants, although I wonder
about those who deny the Resurrection.
I admire much of what the Catholic
Church stands for and its strength
on many societal and moral issues.
Thanks again for responding.
Bob
Paul
replied:
Bob,
I ditto you on my admiration for
Mormon people who, interestingly,
live Catholic teaching on morality
more seriously than many Catholics
today. The recent (BYU) Brigham Young
University incident on premarital
sex, that made the news, is somewhat
of an illustration of this.
Even if you did say, you thought
that Catholicism masqueraded as Christianity,
although obviously
I wouldn't agree, I wouldn't be offended.
Particularly, if you were sincere
and had no malice toward those you
thought believed falsely. I often
presume good intentions of the writer
unless proven otherwise. Although
I probably wouldn't have used that
term, your best bet would be to inquire
with the one who did, to see what
they meant; and to get either an
explanation or an apology.
Yes, you wrote well on the essential
differences between [Catholic, Protestant,
and Eastern Orthodox Christianity]
versus Mormonism, on who Jesus is.
Christianity, for almost two thousand
years, has held the belief in the
divinity of Christ as being consubstantial
and co-equal to the Father, and that
the Holy Spirit is the very heart
of the definition of what a Christian
is. Hence, it would
make logical sense that they wouldn't
recognize Mormon belief as being
Christian.
Catholics, Protestants, and Eastern
Orthodox hold that three eternal
and co-equal Persons of God, the
Trinity, are Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit. This is the foundation of
Christian faith on which all other
truths rest.
Mormons certainly also have the right
to recognize Catholic, Protestant,
and Eastern Orthodox belief as however
they see fit.
This makes sense, doesn't it?
Paul
Mary
Ann replied:
Bob —
The Mormon understanding of "God" and
of "Son" are not Christian.
Their understanding of "God"
is not even Jewish. There is only
verbal parallel in the doctrines,
and the unthinking person naively
plugs in traditional Christian beliefs
into the words. So the word "masquerade" is
apt, except that it implies a purposeful
deception, which is not the case.
The Mormon doctrines "appear" to
be Christian until one knows the
meanings of the words.
Mary Ann
John
replied:
Hi, Bob —
I'm not sure which specific post
you are referring to but I've answered
several questions on Mormonism throughout
the years. Odds are, you are objecting
to something I may have said.
The truth remains the truth. Mormon
Christology cannot be reconciled
with orthodox Christology, anymore
that the Christology of the Jehovah's
Witness can. To be Christian, one
must accept the essential doctrines
of the Christian faith:
Jesus Christ is one, in being,
with the Father and the Holy Spirit.
There are three persons in One
God.
Mormonism has three Gods. God the
Son, is a created being who is the
soul brother of Lucifer.
God, the Father, lives on planet
near the star base Kolob which is
3.5 billion light years from Earth
in the Constellation of Cancer. God
the Father according to Mormon theology,
has a body of His own.
None of this can be reconciled with
the fundamental Christian doctrine
of the Trinity or with the fundamental
Christological formula known as the
Hypostatic Union, therefore, it is
an error to call a Mormon, a Christian.
That said, no one is saying Mormons
are wonderful people. They may honestly
believe they are worshiping Christ,
and as Paul said, they often times
behave like better Christians than
the rest of us, but we could say
the same thing about the Jehovah's
Witness who ascribe to an Arian
heresy.
We are not indicting the Mormon
people. To be honest, if you want
to believe in a God that lives on
a planet near the Star base Kolob,
that's your right, but when you start
to call that belief
system, Christianity, then we have
a problem.
Jesus Christ established
a Church and He gave it authority.
He promised the gates of Hell would
not prevail against it. Either Jesus
Christ is a Liar, or the Catholic
Church is exactly who she says she
is. If people are going to go around
and set up shop calling themselves
Christians, when they deny essential
Christian doctrines, and therefore
make it impossible for them to be
Christians, then we have no choice
but to speak up.
Perhaps, we could have been more
diplomatic in our choice of words.
I'd have to see the original posting.
I'll grant you, if it was one of
my posts, I can sometimes fail to
show Christian charity.
If that's the case, I apologize,
but as for the content itself, I'll
have to stand by it.
John DiMascio
Bob
replied:
Well, Everyone —
This has been a fascinating
journey into the minds of practicing
Catholics, and I've come away with
a new perspective. Paul's response
to my original issue was measured
and respectful, and received with
appreciation. I didn't expect the
attack messages coming from Mary
Ann and John.
To the two of you:
I wonder what makes you react
with such bitterness, condescension
and sarcasm?
If you were my introductions
to the Catholic faith, is this the
kind of church you want to portray?
Why would I or anyone wish to
join with a church represented
by such uncharitable people?
Mary Ann, you
call me and other Mormons naive and
that our understanding is false,
and imply we are duped and need to
be enlightened. Your message is not
one of love, but one of belittling
meanness.
John, your message is filled
with innuendo (soul brother?) and
sarcasm (star base Kolob?), and your
patronizing dismissal of my faith
is also, like Mary Ann's, mean-spirited.
Your attempt to temper your remarks
with an admission that you sometimes
fail to show Christian charity is
pretty weak on the heels of your
vicious attack, and hardly excuses
your incivility.
Paul, on the other
hand, is able to make his points
without attacking me and is interested
in dialog and mutual understanding,
building bridges and not throwing
bombs. He defends historical Christianity
without ripping apart my own faith.
Arrogance doesn't seem to me an effective
tool for winning hearts and minds.
In another context, I'd love to discuss
the doctrinal differences we have
with respectful disagreement and
yet maybe even a little mutual respect.
You can't assert that Catholic doctrine
and history is beyond discussion,
can you?
Does disagreement mean heresy
and condemnation?
I happen to think
the LDS Church has plenty strong
doctrinal legs on which to stand,
but the difference between our faith
and the faith of John and Mary Ann's
is that we approach others' faith
with respect for the good and the
truth they have, we offer what
we feel is something more and give
them the freedom to accept
or reject what we say.
You two seek
to destroy another's faith, and then,
what, expect them to gratefully embrace
Roman Catholicism? Not likely.
I was raised in the Episcopal Church
(Yes, those pesky Anglicans who rejected
the Pope. I have two strikes against
me!) and had many Catholic friends,
and have been a life-long admirer
of your Church and its willingness
to stand against modern tides of
relativism. With that, you've endured
many challenges since Vatican II
and are still beset by many of them
by the words of your own scholars
and laity. I joined the LDS Church
30 years ago because I believed in
its message of restoration and I
believe I received a spiritual witness
attesting to that. You would not
agree and
I understand that. What
upsets me from all this is the new
perspective I mentioned I now have
of your Church based on the vitriol
of two of you.
I have listened with
interest to Catholic radio for a year now with some admiration
of their support and defense of their
Church, and with interest in understanding
the doctrine more clearly. I no longer
listen because in the back of my
mind come the words of John and Mary
Ann, telling me I'm naive and not
a Christian, and probably stupid
to think I was.
You may think your
brand of defense is noble and necessary,
but it's only off-putting. You seem
to think you own the definition of
Christian because of centuries of
tradition, as if age confers accuracy.
At the conclusion of the Sermon on
the Mount, the Savior said that we
can judge people by their fruits
(Matthew 7:20) and your fruits of ridicule
are very plain to see. I see little,
actually none, of the courtesy and
respect from 1 Peter 3:15 and which
your web site professes to adhere
to.
Paul, thank you again for your response; think if I only knew three Catholics,
what might my conclusion be?
Thank
you for maintaining some of my faith
in the Catholic Church.
Regards,
Bob Ligget
Mary
Ann replied:
Bob,
I said nothing of what you accuse
me. By naive I meant someone who
reads Mormonism's doctrines and assumes
the words mean the same things ... many
Christians do so.
It was not a slam
against Mormons, who know very well
what their doctrine is, once they
are fully instructed.
Mary Ann
John
replied:
Bob,
I'm not sure what your issue is.
We deal in the world of truth, not
in the world of feelings. I harbor
no bitterness towards Mormons or
anyone else. I simply pointed out
where Mormon beliefs make
it impossible for them to be Christians.
Do you deny that Mormons believe
Lucifer and Jesus are "soul
brothers"?
And that
Mormons believe that God the Father
has a body and lives on a planet
near
"Star Base Kolob"?
These
are Mormon beliefs and by their very
nature they deny the Trinity and
conflict with orthodox Christology
and therefore make it impossible
for Mormons to be Christian.
Mormonism is not like any other Protestant
denomination which espouses heretical
secondary doctrines. Mormonism gets
it wrong from the beginning. The
God of Mormonism is not the same
God of the Bible. The Mormon Jesus
is also not the same Jesus of Scripture.
Again, this is not reflection on
who Mormons are as people. It's not
said with any meanness or "hatred" or
lack of Christian charity. It is
simply a statement of fact. Mormon
theology starts from heresy, and is based
on a completely heretical book which
the Mormons accept as scripture; it is not Christian.
John
Mike
replied:
Dear Bob,
I'm the Web Admin. for AskACatholic.com.
I've read your complain about our
postings and think you have a point.
Whether one believes in Catholicism
or Mormonism, the members of each
faith probably have different levels
of knowledge about what they believe
about their own faith, whether they
are a Catholic or a Mormon.
If we state something about someone
else's faith, we should be able to
back up what we say.
Certainly I would not want you going
around saying, Catholic doctrine
teaches:
Catholics worship Mary
Catholics worship the saints,
or
Catholics worship statues.
All of which are false and cannot
be backed up by Catholic teaching
documents.
That said, anything we state on our
web site about what Mormons believe,
should be able to be backed-up by
Mormon sources or by Mormon and/or
secular history.
I sense the statements you disagreed
with were:
Mormons believe Lucifer and Jesus
are "soul brothers" and
that Mormons believe that God
the Father has a body and lives
on a planet near "Star Base
Kolob."
and
Mormons masquerade as Christians,
but in fact believe in many gods.
So let me address each one:
On page 109 from Walter Martin's
book "The
Maze of Mormonism", published
by Zondervan in 1962, he addresses
this issue and presents a quote from
a Mormon source.
According to Mormon revelation,
the great star Kolob was the site
for the conception of these plans;
and it will come as no surprise
to students of Mormonism to learn
that Lucifer who was a spirit
brother of Jesus prior to His
incarnation fell from heaven because
of his jealousy of Christ. Christ
was appointed by the gods to become
the redeemer of the race that
would fall as a result of Adam's
sin, and it was this office to
which Lucifer aspired, hence his
antipathy.
Lucifer is even quoted as saying: "Behold,
here am I, send me. I will be
thy son, and I will redeem all
mankind, that one soul shall not
be lost and surely I will do it;
wherefore give me thy honor" (Chapter
4 of the Book of Moses, found
in The
Pearl of Great Price, catalogs
all of these events, including
the fall of Satan and the establishment
of the Garden of Eden [Chapter
6], which students of the Scripture
will be surprised to learn was
really located in Missouri and
not the Mesopotamian area!)
This appears to describe Lucifer
and Jesus were both spirit-children
of God, and that we all are.
It says that Lucifer offered to take
on a human body and save humanity;
and that when Jesus was chosen to
be the redeemer, Lucifer became envious
of him.
Although
you may question the source: "The
Maze of Mormonism" by Walter
Martin, I thought this comment on
Amazon.com about Martin's book was
interesting. I will
let our reader decide whether to
trust Walter Martin or not.
This is an excellent book. When
you see reviews of both extremes,
you know you have a good book.
Ignore the rabid rant reviews
from LDS. Having been a Mormon
myself, I can give you my
testimony that this book is a
well written, very scholarly book.
From the Wikipedia article the Pearl
of Great Price — The book of
Abraham talks
all about Kolob starting in Chapter
3, and is also discussed under
the Facsimile
sub category.
The Pearl of Great Price is
a Mormon source, isn't it?
Although you have been a member
of the church of Latter-day Saints
for thirty years, our colleagues
at Catholic Answers have some fine
information, some of which, you may
have never heard before. Here are
the results
of a web page search from their
site. They have some excellent articles
on this issue.
Let me echo Paul and
John's comments. Paul said:
I am happy our two churches relate
well in Utah and beyond. I have
met many Mormons who have been
wonderful people who, in my view,
by the way they live their lives
seem more Catholic than many Catholics.
and as John stated at the end of
his last reply:
Again, this is not reflection
on who Mormons are as people.
I'm sure there are many Mormons
who perform very good works of charity,
as there are Catholics.
Nevertheless, whether one is a Mormon
or a Catholic, what ones believes
can be in error due to poor catechesis.
We believe only practicing Catholics,
who are always open to correction,
are a solid source for Godly Truth.
Being open to correction, just means
we can make mistakes too : )
If I claim something about another
religion, I should source it, which
I have done.
You said: You refer to
those of us who belong to the LDS
(Latter-day Saints) church as "masquerading
as Christians." How belittling
and how wrong!
I originally found the text from When
was your church founded? from another web site. I thought it
gave a good description of how every
other church of God had actually been founded
by a man, like Joseph Smith in 1830,
and not God, Jesus-Incarnate, like the Catholic Church.
Upon further reflection, I thought the Mormon section was
poorly worded and for that
I apologize.
I'm not sure whether you approve
of the following, but, I've changed
the text from:
Mormons masquerade as Christians,
but in fact believe in many gods.
TO
Practicing Mormons, who are aware
of:
all the Mormon teachings,
and how they differ from
orthodox Christology
masquerade as Christians; they
believe in many gods.
This change accounts for many, in
both our churches, who are at different
levels of knowledge about what they
believe about their own faith.
You said: While it is true
that we do not believe in the
Trinity, as Catholics and Protestants
explain it, we do believe the "central doctrine" that
he is the divine Son of God.
Our
first article of faith states:
"We believe
in God the Eternal Father,
and in His son, Jesus Christ,
and in the Holy Ghost."
It is true, however, that we don't
see them as the same substance but
in different manifestations. We do
see them as separate beings, united
in purpose.
No one is saying that you don't have
any right to believe what you wish
to believe, but when it comes to
talking about what Christianity is,
no one has the right to create
his or her own definition of what
Christianity is. Christianity is
defined by Christ and the Church
He established on St. Peter and his
successors. That Church can be visibly
recognized today as the Roman Catholic
Church; the only Church He established.
It is preached, defended and explained
by practicing Catholic Christians who hold the basic
tenets of the faith.
Those that only
hold on to those basis tenets are called
to accept the full communion of faith and all the teachings the Church believes in.
When others, like members in your church, use the word Christian to describe themselves,
yet redefine what the term Christian means, faithful Catholic Christians have to speak out to protect:
the uncatechized in our Church who are unaware that the term Christian in the Catholic Church means something totally different than it means in the LDS Church.
the non-Christian who is searching for something more than what:
Judaism
Islam, or
Hinduism have to offer.
For the record, John, nor any of
my colleagues ever stated in any
of their replies that "Mormons
masquerade as Christians". The
only place this was found on the
site was from the above article, which has been changed. I am solely responsible for this
and am sorry.
I hope you think my approach on this
issue has been fair.
I've changed the text on my
site, and
have sourced our comments from a Mormon document:
Pearl of Great Price.
If you still think I am being unfair,
please show me how. As it states
in the page header on each of our
page: Dialogue with us.
I'm glad that the Mormon church has
good relations with the Catholic
Church in Utah. Christ tells us in the Gospels
that we should be working toward
one unity in one Church, not over
30,000 churches.
I'd be interested in what you think
of the updates: