Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines & Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Nicholas wrote:

Hi, guys —

  • Is it offensive to Catholics to refer to the books that are in the Catholic bible, but not in Protestant bibles, as the "Apocrypha", given the negative connotations of the word?


  { Is it offensive to Catholics to refer to these books as Apocrypha? }

Paul replied:

Hello Nicholas,

I wouldn't call it offensive, but simply false. Catholics believe in the authority of Christ through His Church which decided, guided by the Holy Spirit, the true Canon of the bible. 

The deuterocanonical books, which are the seven books of the bible that Protestants eliminated after the Reformation, are officially declared inspired books of God.

Since "apocrypha" refers to extra or non-biblical books, it would not be right to call them that.



John replied:

Hi, Nicholas —

It is not accurate more so than offensive. These books are part of the canon, albeit they were generally accepted later. They are therefore called deuterocanonical, meaning books of the second canon, but they are not apocryphal.

Apocryphal means that they are hidden or not in the canon. There are actually apocryphal books for both the New and Old Testament, such as:

  • the Book of Enoch
  • the Testament of the Patriarchs
  • and so forth.

The books our Protestant brothers wrench out of the Old Testament are no part of the Apocrypha. They are part of the Canon so it's not accurate to call them apocryphal.

  • Is it offensive?

I suppose if you really wanted to waste your time being offended over such a thing, but I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.


Eric replied:

Nicholas —

It's a difficult situation, and Catholics recognize that. We cannot refer to them as 'apocrypha' without doing violence to our faith, and they cannot refer to them as "deuterocanonical" without betraying their own principles.

As my colleagues have indicated, I wouldn't get up in arms about it, but it might be gracious, when speaking to Catholics, to use a circumlocution such as:

"the books you call deuterocanonical" or "the disputed books".


Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.