|
Hi, David —
Thanks for the question.
Intinction is allowed if done by either a priest
or trained Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist.
If the priest uses Intinction during Communion,
the recipients may not receive Our Lord
on their hand under the appearance in the consecrated
host; they must receive on their tongue.
From: On
certain matters to be observed or to be avoided
regarding the Most Holy Eucharist
[104.] The communicant must not be permitted to
intinct the host himself in the chalice, nor to
receive the intincted host in the hand. As for
the host to be used for the intinction, it should
be made of valid matter, also consecrated; it is
altogether forbidden to use non-consecrated bread
or other matter.
Different cultures and spiritualities within our
Church have different spiritual needs. It is the
ultimate obligation of the local bishop and pastor
to see the appropriate practices are adopted while
protecting the reverence and respect for the Blessed
Sacrament.
Your brother in prayer, your brother in Christ,
Mike
Definition:
Intinction
The liturgical practice of dipping the consecrated
Host into the consecrated wine in giving Holy Communion.
Its use was already established by the time of Dionysius
of Alexandria (d. 264 A.D.). In time it became a regular
method both in the East and the West.
In the East,
the intinction was (and is) done by means of the
communion spoon (labis). An alternate form of intinction
id described in the Ordines Romani
(sixth century)
and since discontinued. The consecrated Host would
be dipped
into unconsecrated wine. Intinction had
long disappeared in the West, and
has been revived
since the Second Vatican Council (1969).
|